Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider whether a suspension with pay constitutes an “adverse employment action” under the substantive discrimination provision of Title VII. We hold that it typically does not.
I
Michelle Jones was fired in 2011 by her employer, the Southeastern Pennsylvania ' Transportation Authority (SEPTA). SEPTA says it dismissed Jones for submitting fraudulent timesheets; Jones says her termination was the culmination of years of unlawful sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliation. The District Court entered judgment for SEPTA,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Komis v. Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Sheri Minarsky v. Susquehanna CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Artur Davis v. Legal Services Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Collins v. Kimberly-Clark Pennsylvania, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.