Legal Opinion

Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 12, 2015No. 14-3814PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we consider whether a suspension with pay constitutes an “adverse employment action” under the substantive discrimination provision of Title VII. We hold that it typically does not.

I

Michelle Jones was fired in 2011 by her employer, the Southeastern Pennsylvania ' Transportation Authority (SEPTA). SEPTA says it dismissed Jones for submitting fraudulent timesheets; Jones says her termination was the culmination of years of unlawful sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliation. The District Court entered judgment for SEPTA,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Komis v. Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  3. Sheri Minarsky v. Susquehanna CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Artur Davis v. Legal Services Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  5. Collins v. Kimberly-Clark Pennsylvania, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API