Legal Opinion
Henry v. Syebek
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1976No. 5679PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULPEPPER, Judge.
The plaintiff, a pedestrian, seeks damages for personal injuries received when struck by an automobile driven by the defendant. From a judgment rejecting his demand, plaintiff appealed.
The issues are: (1) Was the defendant negligent? (2) Was the plaintiff contribu-torily negligent? (3) Did defendant have a last clear chance to avoid the accident?
The accident occurred at the “T” intersection of Third Street and Daspit Street in the city of Alexandria. At this location, Third Street has four lanes, two for north bound and two for south bound traffic. Daspit intersects the west…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rowe v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Ritter v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guidry v. City of Rayne Police DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kerrigan v. IMPERIAL FIRE AND CAS. INS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Henry v. SvebekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Kerrigan v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Sharbino v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.