Legal Opinion

WED Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Beauchamp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 1993No. 91-2295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOLF, Judge.

Appellant, WED Transportation Systems, Inc. (WED), challenges a final judgment entered in a third-party action determining that WED was responsible for contribution to appellees Yvette Neary (Neary) and Alamo Rent-A-Car (Alamo).1 Appellant raises several issues concerning the final judgment. The first two concern whether a driver of a large commercial vehicle who signals an oncoming driver to turn in front of him owes a duty to reasonably ascertain whether other traffic lanes will safely accommodate the turning driver. The appellant also argues that it is entitled to a new trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. WraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Kerfoot v. WaychoffSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Tellechea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Elmowitz v. Gloria E. Zimmerman, Revocable TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roos v. MorrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API