Legal Opinion

Orr v. Otto Candies, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 2004No. 04-60PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

|,AMY, Judge.

The plaintiff, a merchant marine, filed suit for damages after he sustained injury on the defendant’s property. The trial court found in favor of the defendant, concluding that any fault for the fall was to be equally apportioned between the plaintiff and the plaintiffs employer. The plaintiff appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

The plaintiff, George Michael Orr, was employed by Otto Candies, Inc., as a mate aboard the M/V Ferdie Candies, a push boat. The record indicates that, at the time of the accident in question, the Ferdie Candies…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  2. Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. Boyle v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  5. Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Comeaux v. Wranglers Night ClubLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Barbara Ann Comeaux v. Wranglers Night Club (Bar Andlounge)Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API