Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. v. First Security Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1984No. 83-263Published

1DissentJustice Weber

The letter of credit issued by First Security specifies that payment becomes due only upon unremedied default. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that under the facts of this case, mere non-payment by Prospect constitutes “unremedied default” and automatically triggers liability on the letter of credit.

Section 30-5-114(1), MCA provides that an issuer must honor a demand for payment which complies with the terms of the relevant credit regardless of whether goods or documents conform to the underlying contract between the customer and beneficiary. Strict compliance with the terms of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. North Carolina National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  2. Smith v. GunnissMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gramm v. Insurance UnlimitedMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Pioneer Engineering Works, Inc. v. McConnellMontana Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API