Legal Opinion

Farmer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 2013No. 4D13-2294Published

1Per curiam

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. Petitioner argues that appellate counsel should have argued that the trial court erred in allowing a projector screen to be placed between the defendant and the four-year-old child abuse victim during the child’s testimony at trial.1 See Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 1021, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 101 L.Ed.2d 857 (1988); McLaughlin v. State, 79 So.3d 226, 228-29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Oliver v. State, 125 So.3d 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), rev. granted, 122 So.3d 869 (Fla.2013); Overholt v. State, 110 So.3d 530, 531…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Urbin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Downs v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API