Town of Golden Meadow v. Duet
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion
On the Merits
The defendant-appellant claims that the plaintiff has not complied with the legal requirements for expropriation in that the necessity for the particular land was not shown. The evidence is clear that the proposed route for the protection levee was made according to the best engineering practices, and the testimony of Mr. William *291Hadden, an expert and area engineer for the Department of Public Works, shows the necessity for the acquisition of the particular property in question.
The map showing the proposed location of the levee construction was made under the supervision of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Housing Authority v. BoudwineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Louisiana Highway Commission v. GreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- City of Alexandria v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.