Legal Opinion

Brown v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 7, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit. Heard on exceptions of plaintiff and overruled.

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought by an administrator to recover money paid by an insurance company to a sister of plaintiff’s intestate. At the trial in the Superior Court each party requested a directed verdict and the trial justice directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff, deeming himself aggrieved by this action, has brought the case to this court by his bill of exceptions.

The declaration contains only the common counts and the plaintiff claims that the count for money had and received is supported, by his testimony and that he is entitled to judgment. The evidence proves…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
  2. Blanchett, Adm. v. WillisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API