Cox v. Snell
Supreme Court of Georgia
New trial. Before Judge Carswell. Washington Superior Court. March Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
Sustaining the cerfoorari in this case, a new trial was awarded generally by the court. The evidence upon the *470main points involved was directly conflicting, especially so as to the time stipulated for the performance of the service by the plaintiff, and for which he claims compensation according to the terms of the contract between the parties. Had this first new trial been granted on a motion for that purpose, we should not feel authorized to interpose, as it does not appear that there was the slightest abuse of the discretion exercised by the judge. This rule is as applicable…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway v. FennellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Sellers v. McNairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Ferry & Co. v. Mattox & TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Couch v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Stone v. ElderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.