Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. National Travelers Benefit Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1925No. 25,924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant on an accident insurance policy issued in her favor on the life of her husband, A. H. Schumacher, who died from a gunshot wound.

The policy contained the following provision:

“This certificate shall not extend to nor cover nor is any indemnity promised for injuries sustained while riding a motor cycle, nor injuries received at a time when the assured is under the influence of intoxicating liquors or narcotics, nor injuries received from wars or riots, nor bodily injuries…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. MichelinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Roeh v. Business Men's Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Lundberg v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hannon v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern Travelers' Ass'n v. ShattuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Wertheimer v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Fernandez v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. BradenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API