Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. National Travelers Benefit Ass'n
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 9, 1925No. 25,924PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant on an accident insurance policy issued in her favor on the life of her husband, A. H. Schumacher, who died from a gunshot wound.
The policy contained the following provision:
“This certificate shall not extend to nor cover nor is any indemnity promised for injuries sustained while riding a motor cycle, nor injuries received at a time when the assured is under the influence of intoxicating liquors or narcotics, nor injuries received from wars or riots, nor bodily injuries…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Modern Woodmen of America v. MichelinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Roeh v. Business Men's Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Lundberg v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Hannon v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Travelers' Ass'n v. ShattuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Wertheimer v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Fernandez v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. BradenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.