Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Burns

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. A. Johnson, J.

The respondent moves for reargument of a motion by petitioner for a final order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act or, in the alternative, for a resettled order upon such application. The petitioner seeks an order holding the respondent in contempt for failure to issue a deed in compliance with an order heretofore made herein.

At the outset, it should be noted that the phrase “ summary ' judgment ” has been improperly used by counsel. This is a proceeding under article 78 to which the provisions of rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice are not applicable. However, substantially the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connolly v. BurnsNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Connolly v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blatnicky v. CianciminoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Tolfree v. ConnollyNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Connolly v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Connolly v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  5. Greater Bayside Citizens Ass'n v. BirnsNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API