Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.
There are two motions to dismiss two complaints — one by the wife, Alice K. Anderson, and the other by the husband, .Josey Anderson, on the ground that neither states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiff Alice K. Anderson asks damages in the sum of $100,000, and they are claimed by reason of an alleged assault upon her by this defendant’s agent, who, it appears in the complaint, was employed to collect premiums and solicit insurance. The complaint further states that the plaintiff wife was insured in the defendant company on or about the 20th day of March, 1926, on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mott v. . Consumers' Ice CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Stewart v. . Brooklyn and Crosstown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Muller v. . HillenbrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Keegan v. . the Western R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1853
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosenblatt v. Washington County Cooperative InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Foster v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1968
- Simon v. SimonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1939
- Barney v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Oneta v. Paul Tocci Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947