Legal Opinion

United States v. Quaritius

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application by the United States for leave to file an information against Harold W. Quaritius, charging him with maintaining a nuisance, in violation of the National Prohibition Law.

1Opinion of the Court

GARVIN; District Judge.

The government has applied for leave to file an information against defendant upon the charge of maintaining a nuisance in violation of the National Prohibition Law, commonly known as the Volstead Act (Act Oct. 28, 1919, c. 85, 41 Stat. 305). Prior thereto the defendant, through counsel, made application for leave to be heard when the government should present an information and ask for leave to file the same.

It is asserted, and not controverted, that on or about July 15, 1920, a warrant was issued for the arrest of the defendant upon the charge of unlawfully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. AchenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Hoyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. United States v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Ex parte BredeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1922
  5. In re Informations under Migratory Bird Treaty ActDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API