Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Stuchlik

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1967No. 9792Published

1Opinion of the Court

427 P.2d 278 (1967)

Erling O. CHRISTENSEN and Doris I. Christensen, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Howard E. STUCHLIK, d/b/a Harmony Cafe, Defendant-Appellant, and

Jane Doe, Defendant.

No. 9792.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

May 4, 1967.

Gigray, Boyd & Downen, Caldwell, for appellant.

Weeks & Davis, Nampa, for respondents.

McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiffs-respondents instituted this action for damages for personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Christensen while a patron in the cafe of defendant-appellant, Howard E. Stuchlik, the only defendant that was served. The case was tried by a jury, which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  3. 6551 Collins Avenue Corp. v. MillenSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Helgeson Ex Rel. Helgeson v. PowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Joseph Rotondo v. Isthmian Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API