Legal Opinion

Mervyn v. Kleinman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1916No. Civil No. 1483PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The appellee, as plaintiff, set forth as a cause of action the failure and refosal of the defendant-appellant .to pay to plaintiff $1,000 as a commission or compensation promised him as a broker to sell two stallions and one jack, the property of the defendant. The plaintiff alleges that the contract of employment was oral; that plaintiff, in pursuance to his contract of employment, produced a purchaser for said property, ready and willing to buy, and consenting to the terms and conditions defendant authorized plaintiff to require in order to earn the right to his commission.

The defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McMurran v. DuncanArizona Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butterfield v. MacKenzieArizona Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API