Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo Joseph Critchlow

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1972No. 71-1537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The above-named defendant-appellant, convicted and sentenced upon verdict of a jury for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, appeals on the grounds (1) that his sentence under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (18 U.S.C. § 5010(b)), until discharged by the Youth Corrections Division of the Board of Parole as provided by 18 U.S.C. § 5017(c), was illegal since this involved the possibility of incarceration beyond the five years provided in Section 2312 for violation of the Dyer Act; (2) that he was unconstitutionally denied a speedy trial by reason of a four month lapse of time from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jerry Wayne Watts v. John T. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Pueblo v. Acevedo ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API