United States v. Leo Joseph Critchlow
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
The above-named defendant-appellant, convicted and sentenced upon verdict of a jury for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, appeals on the grounds (1) that his sentence under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (18 U.S.C. § 5010(b)), until discharged by the Youth Corrections Division of the Board of Parole as provided by 18 U.S.C. § 5017(c), was illegal since this involved the possibility of incarceration beyond the five years provided in Section 2312 for violation of the Dyer Act; (2) that he was unconstitutionally denied a speedy trial by reason of a four month lapse of time from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jerry Wayne Watts v. John T. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Pueblo v. Acevedo ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1975