Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Dallas Independent School District

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 5, 2012No. 05-11-00465-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MORRIS.

This case involves a claim brought under the Texas Whistleblower Act. The trial court granted the Dallas Independent School District’s plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed James Mullins’s claim. In a single issue, Mullins contends the trial court erred in granting the plea because he presented sufficient evidence to raise a question of fact about the trial court’s jurisdiction over his claim. We conclude Mullins failed to meet his burden to raise a fact question on the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm the trial court’s order granting the plea.

I

B…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. LueckTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Llanes v. Corpus Christi Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. University of Houston v. Stephen BarthTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Beverly A. Cluff-Landry v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  3. S.W., as Next Friend of A.W. v. Arlington Independent School District and Lindsey Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  4. Wilson v. Dallas Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. City of Donna v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API