Mullins v. Dallas Independent School District
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice MORRIS.
This case involves a claim brought under the Texas Whistleblower Act. The trial court granted the Dallas Independent School District’s plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed James Mullins’s claim. In a single issue, Mullins contends the trial court erred in granting the plea because he presented sufficient evidence to raise a question of fact about the trial court’s jurisdiction over his claim. We conclude Mullins failed to meet his burden to raise a fact question on the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm the trial court’s order granting the plea.
I
B…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LueckTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Llanes v. Corpus Christi Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- University of Houston v. Stephen BarthTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Beverly A. Cluff-Landry v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- S.W., as Next Friend of A.W. v. Arlington Independent School District and Lindsey Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
- Wilson v. Dallas Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- City of Donna v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.