Legal Opinion · Dissent

Freyholtz v. Blackduck School District 32

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 2000No. C1-00-268Published

1DissentGilbert, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority ignores the facts of this case to uphold an artificial application of our precedent with unreasonable consequences. At a time when there is a concern for frivolous litigation and unfounded workers’ compensation claims, the employee should not be penalized for the failure to notify the employer immediately when she did not take her injury too seriously at first, thought that *759her chiropractor could take care of the problem and continued on at work. As soon as the employee discovered that the injury was more serious than she originally believed and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kling v. St. Barnabas HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API