S. A. Hirsh Manufacturing Co. v. Childs
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McILVAINE, District Judge.
After judgment was entered in this case, the defendant filed a motion for modification of the order for judgment. Argument was held on this motion and it was understood at the time of argument that the requirements of the order calling for a label to be secured by waterproof glue would be amended so as to permit other adequate adhesive to prevent accidental removal. It was also agreed that the order was to be amended in respect to the shelving and uprights to which said labels would be applied. Such a proposed amended order has been submitted by defendant’s counsel…
2Cited by4 opinions
- J.T.P. Development Corp. v. Majestic Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
- Mobile Power Enterprises, Inc. v. Power Vac, Inc., and Anilas Corporation, Eugene Ashley Gaiters v. Power Vac, Inc., and Anilas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- American Steel Works v. Hurley Construction Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Caribbean Petroleum Corp. v. Velez TorresTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2000