Legal Opinion

Wortham v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1974No. 1848PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before, RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CONNOR, ERWIN, BOOCHEVER and FITZGERALD, JJ. CONNOR, Justice.

Appellant Wortham is wanted by the California authorities for violating three conditions of his parole: (1) leaving his place of residence without the permission of his parole agent; (2) failing to report on the first of every month beginning with July 1, 1971; and (3) possessing and using a pistol.

On September 8, 1972, appellant was charged with being a fugitive from justice in violation of AS 12.70.020. In response to papers (dated September 28, 1972) from the Governor of California, 1…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Oliver Lee Kirkland and Elizabeth Smith v. Paul H. Preston and Luke MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Hithe v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Grano v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Frontier Saloon, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Paul v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Davenport v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wilson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API