Edwards v. Hasbrook
Texas Supreme Court
The material facts of this case are stated in the opinion of the court. in opposition to the defendant’s first exception to the petition, cited Major v. Hammond, 9 JB. & 0. 364; Boche v. Campbell, 3 Camp. 247; Block v. Bell, 1 M. & Bob. 149; 3 Kent, 75. As to the second ■exception, he cited the case of Wallace v. McConnell, 13 Pet. 136.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheeler
This was a suit by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, upon a promissory note.
The petition alleges “that I. G. Hasbrook, on the 22d day of August, in the year 1843, made his certain promissory note in writing, bearing date the day and year aforesaid, and thereby then promised to pay, forty days after the date thereof, to the order of I. G. Hasbrook, the sum of, etc., . at the Bank of Salina, etc. . . . And the said I. G. Has-brook, to whose order the said sum of money in the said note specified, was to be paid,” etc., . . . “indorsed the said *580note, bj which said indorsement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Caldwell v. CassidyNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Irvine v. WithersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1827
- Shiff v. HertzoggSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838