Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1939No. 31,850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Defendant Standard Oil Company appeals from the order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict for plaintiff or a new trial. The verdict was also against defendant Fike, but he is not a party to this appeal. The Standard Oil Company will be mentioned as though it were the only defendant.

During 1936 and most of 1937 Mr. Fike was in the employ of defendant as a sales supervisor in a considerable territory in southwestern Minnesota. His headquarters were at Winthrop. His territory was 80 miles from Minneapolis at its closest point. Defendant furnished him an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Guzenfield v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Abbey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Ewer v. CoppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Guerin v. Cyrille MongeonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eicher v. Universal UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Schultz v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Truman v. United Products CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Clemens v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
  5. Kalinowski v. OdlewanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API