Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Provident Savings Bank

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 11, 1999Published

1Per curiam

Defendants, William and Esther Dioguardi, appeal from that portion of the order discharging their mortgage on the property known as 510 West End Avenue, Avon, New Jersey and denying their motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge McGann’s well-reasoned opinion, Mooney v. The Provident Savings Bank, 308 N.J.Super. 195, 705 A.2d 816 (Ch.Div.1997). We agree that the equitable considerations found to exist by Judge McGann allowed him to depart from the warranty of title theory adhered to in Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Currie, 284…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Old Republic Ins. Co. v. CurrieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  2. Mooney v. Provident Savings BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API