Legal Opinion

Greenly v. Daniels

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 19, 1869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case 11 — PETITION ORDINARY^- CITED Civil Code, sees. 93-105,106. 2 Duvall, 540, Ruby v. Grace. CITED Civil Code, secs. 98, 580. 14 B. Mon. 647. 16 B. Mon. 350.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HARDIN

dbmvbrbd thb opinion of the court.

On the 10th day of May, 1858, the following order was made by the Hardin County Court: “ Ordered, that Washington Smith be appointed guardian of Isabella Daniels, Eeuben Daniels, and Charles Daniels, heirs of Eichard B. Daniels, deceased; and thereupon the said Smith took the oath required by law, and gave bond, with Thomas B. Greenly and John O. Withers his security.”

But the covenant given, as appears from the record, recites only that Smith was appointed as guardian to said Isabella and Eeuben Daniels, and contains no stipulation to secure the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willis' Adm'r v. Roberts' Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API