Legal Opinion

Rolle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 8, 2013No. 3D11-1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.

The appellant, Brandon Rolle, appeals his conviction for first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm. He alleges error in the admission of an out-of-court photo lineup identification and the denial of his request to recall a State witness for further cross-examination. We review the first claim de novo, and the second for abuse of discretion. Delhall v. State, 95 So.3d 134, 150 (Fla.2012); McDuffie v. State, 970 So.2d 312, 324 (Fla.2007).

“A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress is clothed with a presumption of correctness on appeal, and the reviewing court must interpret the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Rimmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Delhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. State v. ManuelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ngoc C. Thach v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API