Legal Opinion

Noltey v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1932No. 8 Div. 445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The first count of the indictment is in form 101, § 4556, except that the word “buy” is omitted. There is no contention that it is subject to demurrer. The second count adds the words “or beverages, to-wit: Jamica (sic) ginger,” and is otherwise the same as count 1.

The claim is that count 2 is defective because Jamaica ginger is not a prohibited liquor as defined by section 4615. But that section defines such liquor, among others, as (4) “any intoxicating bitters or beverages by whatever name called,” and (5) “any liquor, drink, or liquid made or used for beverage purposes containing any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Grattan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Carson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Carl v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. EmbrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Holt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API