Crutchfield v. Thurman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 54 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED— 7 Mon., 617; Blight's heirs vs. Tobin. Hill on Trustees, 144-5. 3 Bibb, 177; Estill vs. Estill, <^c. 1 Mar., 231; Owings vs. McClain. 3 /. J. Mar., 276; Orr vs. Pickett, fyc. 3 Johnson's Chy. R., 261; Duke of Cumberland vs. Cadrington, SfC. 4 Johnson's Ghy. R., 136; Shepherd vs. Eaves. 1 Johnson's Ghy. R., 339; Haven vs. Hays. CITED— Hobart's R., 105 ; Lampleigh vs. Brathwait.
Read the full summary
CASE 54 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED— 7 Mon., 617; Blight's heirs vs. Tobin. Hill on Trustees, 144-5. 3 Bibb, 177; Estill vs. Estill, <^c. 1 Mar., 231; Owings vs. McClain. 3 /. J. Mar., 276; Orr vs. Pickett, fyc. 3 Johnson's Chy. R., 261; Duke of Cumberland vs. Cadrington, SfC. 4 Johnson's Ghy. R., 136; Shepherd vs. Eaves. 1 Johnson's Ghy. R., 339; Haven vs. Hays. CITED— Hobart's R., 105 ; Lampleigh vs. Brathwait. Smith's Leading Cases, 4th Amer. ed., s. p. 67, top page 193.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion oe the court:
The appellant, Edward Crutchfield, domiciled in the city of Louisville, Kentucky, in a brick tenement owned by him on First street, between Chestnut and Gray streets, left Kentucky in September, 1861, engaged in the cause of the Southern Confederacy, and did not return home until some time in the year 1865. During his absence some of his creditors, proceeding by attachment, obtained, in the city court of chancery, a decretal order for the sale of the house and lot, which, in execution of that judicial mandate, the marshal sold at auction to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
- In re Rapier Sugar Feed Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1935