Legal Opinion

C.B.D. v. W.E.B.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1980No. Civ. No. 9788PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The defendant, W.E.B. (hereinafter Walter), appeals from the judgment entered in Cass County District Court which found that he was the father of C.B.D.’s (hereinafter Cheryl) son, M.D.D. (hereinafter Matthew). The judgment required Walter to pay child support but denied him visitation rights. We affirm the judgment. Because this case was brought under Chapter 14-17, N.D.C.C. (Uniform Parentage Act), all names used herein are pseudonyms.

Cheryl began working for Walter in California in 1973 after she was graduated from the University of California Los Angeles…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. In Re Estate of ElmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Builders Steel Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  4. Gardebring v. RizzoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Schuh v. Allery Ex Rel. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mansukhani v. PailingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bergstrom v. BergstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lithun v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Thomas v. SticklandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Zimprich v. North Dakota Harvestore Systems, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API