Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1992No. 26A04-9205-CR-159PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Lucille Mayberry appeals her conviction for forgery, a class C felony. IND.CODE 35-43-5-2.

We affirm.

Mayberry presents two issues for our review:

1. whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of approximately twenty forged checks made out to her; and

2. whether her sentence is manifestly unreasonable.

Thelma Myers, age 85, and Lucille May-berry, age 66, live in the same apartment complex in Haubstadt, Indiana. Mayberry helped Myers with household chores such as bringing in the mail, giving her baths, and other chores. In September, 1992, Mayberry cashed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Malone v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Duvall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bedgood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Reichard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Wallace v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Giles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. McGinity v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API