Legal Opinion

Ditmars v. Renz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff alleges in his amended complaint that in September, 1929, “ the defendant Midtown Bank of New York retained the plaintiff as a broker for the purpose of negotiating the sale of certain shares of stock of said Midtown Bank of New York;” that thereafter the defendant sold to Ungerleider Financial Corporation 3,600 shares of its stock for a total sum of $288,000, and that such sale “ was brought about by the plaintiff and resulted solely from his services.” The verdict of the jury was in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,880. Upon this appeal the defendant urges that the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tulp v. PadulaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  2. Caltabiano v. State Bank of Long IslandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Matos v. HiraldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Matos v. HiraldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Rom v. SeufertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API