Guionnet v. Specht
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, District Judge.
The matters calling for decision herein are questions of law raised by affidavit of defense pursuant to the *865Pennsylvania Practice Act of May 14, 1915 (Pa. St 1920, § 17181 et seq.). The facts are substantially as'follows:
Prior to September. 2, 1920, the plaintiff was negotiating with the defendant for the purchase of a large amount of coal. In those negotiations he was acting as agent of the Framerican Industrial Development Corporation, a New York corporation, which in turn was the agent of Schneider & Co., óf Le Creusot, France. On September 2, 1920, the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hutchinson Baking Co. v. MarvelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Morse v. Tillotson & Wolcott Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Sloan Corp. v. LintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Pennsylvania Lubricating Co. v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Conard v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guionnet v. SpechtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Small v. SpechtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924