Legal Opinion

Guionnet v. Specht

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The matters calling for decision herein are questions of law raised by affidavit of defense pursuant to the *865Pennsylvania Practice Act of May 14, 1915 (Pa. St 1920, § 17181 et seq.). The facts are substantially as'follows:

Prior to September. 2, 1920, the plaintiff was negotiating with the defendant for the purchase of a large amount of coal. In those negotiations he was acting as agent of the Framerican Industrial Development Corporation, a New York corporation, which in turn was the agent of Schneider & Co., óf Le Creusot, France. On September 2, 1920, the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hutchinson Baking Co. v. MarvelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Morse v. Tillotson & Wolcott Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Sloan Corp. v. LintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Pennsylvania Lubricating Co. v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Conard v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guionnet v. SpechtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  2. Small v. SpechtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API