Legal Opinion

Schott v. City of Kingman

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 6, 1970No. Civ-1067PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT

CRAIG, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident of California, seeks to recover reimbursement for expenditures incurred in the construction of water lines which defendant, an incorporated municipality and a subdivision of the State of Arizona, is presently using to deliver water to individual users. Plaintiff prays for the reasonable value of the water lines under a theory of implied contract, or alternatively, unjust enrichment.

This Court’s diversity jurisdiction is invoked under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The claim is in excess of $10,000.

*428This matter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Seguros Tepeyac, S. A., Compania Mexicana De Seguros Generales v. James L. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Sherrill v. McShanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anna Mae Schott v. City of Kingman, an Incorporated Arizona MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API