Legal Opinion
Freeholders of Burlington Cty. v. McCorkle
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 5, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 N.J. Super. 451 (1968)
237 A.2d 640
THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, ET AL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
LLOYD W. McCORKLE, COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided January 5, 1968.
Mr. Sanford Soren, County Solicitor, attorney for plaintiffs (Mr. Richard D. Ehrlich appearing).
Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of State of New Jersey, attorney for defendants (Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak appearing).
MARTINO, A.J.S.C.
The parties to this litigation have agreed upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- James Stewart & Co. v. SadrakulaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Penn Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pacific Coast Dairy, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bliss Ex Rel. Jackson v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McFarlin v. Benny Y.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Orlovetz v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
- In Re MyrickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Debbie F.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State in Interest of DBSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.