Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gaissert v. Gaissert

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1961No. 2824Published

1ConcurrenceHood, Associate Judge

I concur, but I have some doubts which I believe should be expressed. The exact holding in Thomason v. Thomason, 107 U.S. App.D.C. 27, 274 F.2d 89, was that the Domestic Relations Branch of the Municipal Court has jurisdiction over a counterclaim seeking a money judgment for arrears in payments due under a foreign decree for the support of minor children. Since the jurisdiction of the Domestic Relations Branch is exclusive, it would' appear that no other court in the District of Columbia and no other branch of the Municipal Court would have jurisdiction of such a claim.

In holding that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellen L. Thomason v. William R. ThomasonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. Darden v. DardenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Purcell L. Smith v. Elizabeth W. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API