Legal Opinion

Rose v. McEachern

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1936No. 7911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was to recover as overpayments taxes paid in 1929, 1930, and 1931. They were paid by appellee as administrator of the estate of S. C. McEachern on account of collections of certain installment obligations held by the deceased at his death. Appellant, admitting that the amounts sued for had been in form erroneously paid, defended against paying them back on the ground that those amounts and more were due by plaintiff to the United States on account of those obligations, and that therefore, “under the circumstances of the case, he was not obligated by the ties…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Light & Traction Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  2. American Light & Traction Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Davison Gulfport Fertilizer Co. v. Gulf & Ship Island R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API