Fried v. Kervick
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Feawois, J.
Plaintiff Sam Fried, a retail gasoline dealer, sought a Superior Court injunction restraining the enforcement of N. J. 8. A. 56:6-2(a), (c), (d), (e), which regulates certain aspects of the retail sale of gasoline. The relief sought was predicated upon a claim that the statute is unconstitutional. The Chancery Division found otherwise and granted summary judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff’s subsequent appeal to the Appellate Division was certified on our motion prior to argument there.
N. J. 8. A. 56:6-2 (a) requires retail dealers to post…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Olsen v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Western Reference & Bond Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Matter of CVS Pharmacy WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Grand Union Co. v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Stamboulos v. McKeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.