Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1985No. 502-84PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for the offense of forgery. See V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 32.-21(a)(1)(B). He pled guilty before a Dallas County District Court magistrate. The district court judge pronounced appellant guilty, and sentenced him to ten years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $5,000.00 fine. On appeal to the Dallas Court of Appeals, 668 S.W.2d 430 (Tex.App.Dallas—1984), appellant’s conviction was reversed and remanded for a new trial. We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Ex Parte Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Spindler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API