Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pereus Food Emporium, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 2001Published

1DissentJiuliante, Senior Judge

I respectfully dissent. I believe that the evidence of record supports the trial court’s determination that Applicant met the “actual need” requirements as set forth in West Reading Tavern v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 710 A.2d 648 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998) and Chadds Ford Tavern, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 736 A.2d 70 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999). With regard to the unique services provided by Villa Capri, the trial court made the following findings:

7. The Petitioner’s premises is the only establishment in Middle Smithfield Township that cooks its bread and sauces from all fresh…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. West Reading Tavern, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Chadds Ford Tavern, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API