Kirn v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commissions

Although I concur in the result, I believe our court has thereby condoned submission without a brief by respondent. I realize Rule 84.04(f) does not require a respondent *526to file a brief. But several cases, last that of State ex rel. Neal v. Karl, 627 S.W.2d 913[1], ruling briefs “by both parties are encouraged in order to give all parties the opportunity to aid the court in reaching a proper decision.”