Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Bruce Barton v. Adt Security Services Pension

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 20, 2016No. 13-56379Published

1Dissent

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge, with whom O’SCANNLAIN, GOULD, TALLMAN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, join,

dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc:

A party may petition for rehearing en banc when “the panel decision conflicts with a decision of the United States Supreme Court or of the court to which the petition is addressed ,.. and consideration by the full court is therefore necessary to secure and maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions.” Fed. R. App. P. 35(b)(1)(A).

In this case, the majority ignores United States Supreme Court precedent and our own Employee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Walker v. American Home Shield Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API