Legal Opinion
Pearson v. InTouchCX Solutions, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 23, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01888Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 FREDDIE PEARSON, et al., Case No.: 2:23-cv-01888-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiffs Order Granting in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 5 v. [ECF No. 28] 6 INTOUCHCX SOLUTIONS, INC., 7 Defendant 8 Plaintiffs Freddie Pearson and Lea Ann Dailey sue their former employer, InTouchCX 9 Solutions, alleging InTouch failed to pay them for overtime hours in violation of the Fair Labor 10 Standards Act (FLSA). The plaintiffs purport to represent a collective of former call center 11 agents who worked for InTouch during the three years preceding the filing of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kwan v. SanMedica InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Navajo Nation v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.