Pasco Flour Mills Co. v. City Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for breach of contract; from city court of Carrollton—■ Judge Beall. February -13, 1918. The motion to dismiss the writ of error was on the ground that “none of the rulings complained of amount to a final disposition of the cause, and if they had been sustained by the court they would not have amounted to a final disposition of the cause.”
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.
1. There is no merit in the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions.
2. Upon the demurrer, attacking, the plaintiff’s petition on both general and special grounds, the court entered a judgment, dated February 13, 1918, “that the demurrer to paragraph 3 of the declaration be sustained unless amended within 10 days from this date so as to meet the objections raised by the demurrer.” The plaintiff; within ten days ' thereafter, filed in the office of the clerk of the court a paper purporting to be an amendment to the petition, and served a copy thereof upon opposing counsel. This amendment,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. VassarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kumpe v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Elrod v. HulettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Harris v. Haralson Farm Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Park v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Hix v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.