Legal Opinion

In re Phillies

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion denied.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Foster. Judges Froessel and Van Voorhis concur in the following memorandum: We do not agree that grievous error *877was committed by the learned Referee in securing a copy of the provisions of the New York City Police Department Eules and Procedures adopted pursuant to law (Public Officers Law, § 66-a). A trial or appellate court may take judicial notice of a rule or regulation of an executive department or officer of any city within the State (Civ. Prac. Act, § 344-a, subd. A, par. 4; Administrative Code of City of New…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MortelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. In Re BogartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. Ball v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API