Legal Opinion
Toro v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered March 14, 1991, which granted petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In view of respondent’s receipt of the police accident report, as well as a report of the accident from its own employee, it is evident that respondent had actual notice of the accident within the 90-day statutory period, and, as the IAS court put it, "ample opportunity to investigate the incident” (citing Matter of Cicio v City of New York, 98 AD2d 38; see also, Joseph v New York City Hous. Auth.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cicio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Goodall v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Joseph v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Sokolowski v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ippolito v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Price v. HersticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Matter of Dubuche v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Matter of Mercedes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Moore v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.