Legal Opinion

Barnett v. The Kroger Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 8, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00544Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TASHEBA BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:22-cv-544 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE THE KROGER COMPANY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Tasheba Barnett, Adele Hoffman, and Chadaela Lovincey allege that two grocery stores, The Kroger Co. and Fred Meyer, Inc. (the Grocery Stores), sold rice-rusk teething wafers that contained elevated levels of toxic metals. Plaintiffs regularly purchased these snacks for their young children but maintain that they would not have done so had they known the wafers contained…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. United States v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API