Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Calvaruso v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 2014No. 2013-0280Published

1DissentLanzinger, J.

{¶ 41} While I agree that quo warranto cannot be used to oust Brown from an “acting chief of police” position, because that position is a temporary assignment rather than a public office, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that Brown is not a “de facto deputy chief’ and therefore cannot be ousted through an action in quo warranto. I would grant the writ.

{¶ 42} The majority relies on the proposition that quo warranto will not test the legality of a public officer’s official action. State ex rel. Berry v. Tackett, 60 Ohio St.2d 12, 396 N.E.2d 743 (1979). Yet that is not the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Berry v. TackettOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Local 330, Akron Firefighters Ass'n v. RomanoskiOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API