Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. LALIBERTE

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 2010No. 4D08-2211PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

We grant the plaintiffs motion for rehearing, vacate our prior opinion, and issue this opinion in its place. Having taken a second comprehensive review of the arguments and record, we now affirm.

The defendant, an auto manufacturer, appealed a multi-million dollar judgment, which resulted from the tragic death of the plaintiffs son. Two issues were raised. The first concerned the trial court’s remarks to the jury during the jury’s inspection of two exemplar vehicles. The second concerned the trial court’s exclusion of statistical information and demonstrative evidence to…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Heath v. Suzuki Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Trees by & Through Trees v. K-MARTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Alston v. ShiverSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Arizona Chemical Co. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. LALIBERTEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API