Legal Opinion

Clarence Herndon v. Daniel Heyns

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2017No. 16-2706UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Clarence W. Herndon, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the grant of summary judgment to the defendants in this civil rights, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as the district court’s denial of Herndon’s subsequent motion for reconsideration. We find no basis upon which to overturn the district court’s judgment and affirm.

In 2013, the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) implemented the Interim Care Program (ICP), establishing the unit where Herndon is housed at the Ionia Correctional Facility. (Prior to this, Herndon was housed in administrative segregation as the result…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Bellamy v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Leona Mullins v. Oscar CyranekCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Indah v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bell v. HowesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. Dowdy v. VantellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
  3. Dowdy v. VantellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Hightower v. BurkettDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025
  5. Lopp 654488 v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API