Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1990No. 14206PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cacioppo, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Tarice L. Smith appeals his conviction of armed robbery, R.C. 2911.01(A)(1); aggravated burglary, R.C. 2911.11(A)(3); and felonious assault, R.C. 2903.11(A)(2). We affirm.
On June 28, 1989, a jury found Tarice L. Smith guilty on three of the five counts charged in the indictment. He was found not guilty of one of the counts of armed robbery and not guilty of count five of the indictment, having a weapon under a disability. The jury also found him not guilty of any of the firearm specifications, R.C. 2941.141, charged in the indictment. The trial court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. TwyfordOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CragoOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. TwyfordOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AllahOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. LeasureOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.