Legal Opinion

Joe Delegal v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1966No. 23213_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s conviction, after a trial without a jury, was affirmed by this Court in Delegal v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 329 F.2d 494, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 821, 85 S.Ct. 44, 13 L.Ed.2d 32. Appellant subsequently sought to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, on the grounds that (1) at his trial the Government was permitted to question him regarding prior convictions over his objection that, not having put his character in issue, he could not be required to incriminate himself in this manner and (2) the Judge’s oral response to this objection indicated bias on the part of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henry Franklin Boruff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Lewis Woodard Larson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Charles Elmer Nash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Erwin M. Enzor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Paul Milo Van De Bogart, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richard Joseph Lynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Fanklin Delano Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Pope v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1967
  4. Bradshaw v. State of OklahomaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Lawrence C. Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API